Spying on Employees The Lisa Elton Case

SPYING ON EMPLOYEES: THE LISA ELTON CASE 3

Spyingon Employees: The Lisa Elton Case

Spyingon Employees: The Lisa Elton Case

IfI was Lisa Elton, I would have decided to install spying microphonesand cameras. This is because it was the only remaining effectivemethod of protecting the resources of the company by exposing theillegal and unethical practices by one or few of the employees. Inthis case, the end justifies the means, and the results of camera andvoice spying by Lisa exposed the various channels that the businesswas losing profits through pilferage. Not only did the spying exposetheft, it exposed other practices that cost the business its profitsand resources. Therefore, I would expressly spy on the employees.Employershave an implied right to spy their employees if the solution willprotect their enterprises by exposing illegal practices. Whileemployers have no express right to spy on employees, they still dohave a right to protect their resources and property using the bestmethods they deem right. At the same time, employees have a right toprivacy while doing their work, and even outside their workstations.However, the right to privacy of the employees should not be upheldat the expense of the loss of the resources of the employer. Thisgives employers the implied right to spy on the employees if it isevidently necessary to protect their resources.Toprotect their assets and evaluate the behavior of employees,employers seek the help of technology and spying methods for keepinga check of their enterprises. This gives employers a right to spy ontheir employees as they seek to protect the resources. The protectionof the company resources is not only important to the employer, butalso to the employees. This is because the business enterprise is notonly sustaining the employer, but also the workers. Therefore,employers have a right to protect the resources of the company, eventhrough the use of the spying methodologies. The employers cannothold seek to protect the privacy of the employees at the expense ofthe resources of the company.The privacy of employees istheir right, but does not override the need for protecting theresources of employees. At the same time, spying on employees is apractice whose ethics on the side of the employer is determined bythe process used and the results obtained. The process used by theemployer should not expose the employees to other people. Similarly,the results of spying should not expose the private information ofthe employees to the masses. This is because the employees have aright to privacy, and breach of this right could be illegal foremployers. Therefore, employers should use spying on employees as thelast resort to get the truth about property loss. Therefore, spyingshould be used where all other methods of protecting the company havefailed.LisaElton should take strict measures to make sure that the informationshe has gathered is kept private and confidential to her. Theinformation on the private life of other employees should be private,to adhere to their right to privacy. However, Lisa should take theappropriate disciplinary action on the wrong doers, especially thethief and those who are selling jewelry and Avon products. This willstop the thieves or terminate their employment contracts in order toget them away from the business and prevent future loss. Lisa shouldbe confidential because the action on with the information acquiredfrom the spying exercise would determine the ethics of the wholeprocess.